Scientific Program

Day 1 :

Keynote Forum

Antonina Getsman

Private dental, Russia

Keynote: Modern Pediatric dentistry : The way from past to future

Time : 10.00-10.40

Biography:

Head doctor in one of the Private dental clinics Dental Fantasy, Russia, Moscow. Works with children from the earliest childhood to teenagers (from infancy to adolescence). Uses operative microscope in daily practice since 2008.Clinical and scientific activity.Her publications focus on dental treatment in children of different age groups  by means of modern  technologies (for example, rubberdam (for kids), operative microscope, root canal treatment, crowns, conscious sedation, behavioural management e.t.c.) and preventive care (hygiene, preventive programs for kinds with primary and permanent teeth).The author of a training course for pedodontists: "Dental treatment for children - myth or reality ". Speaker of the educational centre Medical Consulting Group, Russia.

Abstract:

Today pedodontists face with not an easy task. It is necessary to keep children's dental health, for decrease of the development of caries risks and progressing oral diseases. The second important goal is  improvement of quality of life (functional and esthetic aspects are important). It is known that children's carious lesions appear at more young age (if compare prevalence with the period of five and, even, three-year ago). In light of this, pedodontists need to increasing their skills (both in non-medical and medical behaviour management, and routine dental manipulations). By the same token, parents of our patients want to get treatments without any stress for kids and with the most successful late fate for teeth. All abovementioned dictates requirements to the modern Paediatric practice. We understand that the dental clinic for kids nowadays has to provide treatment for patients from 0 to 18 years, has to use safety sedation and a high quality general anaesthesia, staff have to use communication  technicians (during conversation with children and parents). Treatment of primary teeth has to be done only once and be sufficient before eruption of permanent teeth. Treatment of the immature teeth has to rely on the principles of minimum invasive dentistry.During the lecture I will answer 4 important questions:1) How modern pediatric clinic looks like? (design, work conditions and patient’s logistics).2) Which kind of modern technologies shall we use in daily practice? (composite restoration, rubber dam isolation, pulpitis treatment per one visit, crowns for kids, microscope as a daily technology).3) Everything new is well-forgotten old: What we need for successful routine work? (choice, decision, plan).4) Are children agree with us? Dental world by children’s impression (few words about behaviour management)

 

  • Advanced tools and Techniques in Dental Science

Session Introduction

Talal Al-Nahlawi

Syrian Private University,Syria

Title: Broken Instrument Managment in Daily Endodontics Practice
Speaker
Biography:

Talal Al-Nahlawi has graduated from Faculty of Dentistry-Damascus University 1999; he completed his post graduate diploma in endodontics in 2001, Master of Science in 2004, and PhD degree in 2009 from Damascus University. Since then he became an assistant professor at Operative dentistry and Endodontics department at Damascus and Syrian Private Universities. He was conferred into the title of associate professor in 2015. He has a private practice in Damascus and United Arab Emirates limited to Endodontics. He lectured in many national and international dental meetings (Syria, Canada, Brazil, Iraq, Turkey, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, India, Lebanon, and South Africa).

 

Abstract:

The accident of endodontic files separation is considered the most annoying accident that can face the dentist during his/her daily endodontic practice. The management of such accident needs sufficient understanding of the type and geometry of broken file, location and size of the file, amount of canal disinfection before file separation, and length with amount of engagement with canal walls. After thorough clinical and X ray examination, treatment plan must be based upon three options: bypassing, removal, or leaving the broken file inside the canal with monitoring. The objective of this presentation is to highlight the factors contributing to file separation and how to avoid it along with a description of a novel technique for bypassing a broken file, and how to remove a broken file when indicated through many clinical cases with illustrations and videos.

 

  • Oral Microbiology and Pathology

Session Introduction

Mohammed Qasim

Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences,Iraq

Title: Indirect Composite Restoration of Endodontically Treated Maxillary First Molar: A Case Report
Biography:

Abstract:

Background: Resin composite is considered the first choice for restoration of permanent teeth. Low cost, adhesion to tooth structure and being biologically acceptance makes it material of choice in most of the cases. However, sophisticated restoration procedure, moisture sensitivity and difficult manipulation limit its application as a direct restoration especially in cases of badly decayed/broken teeth.Case Report: In this report the author a case of indirect composite restoration for right maxillary molar. The tooth was badly carious and symptoms were classical for chronic pulpitis. Root canal treatment was done in one visit. Because the crown of the tooth has lost most of its structure, treatment plan was shifted from direct to indirect composite restoration. The cavity was filled with self-adhesive core build up dual-cure material and prepared with high speed handpiece to remove any undercut and make the cavity divergent occlusally. Impression was made, poured with stone and sectioned to obtain separated die. Teflon tape was used as a separating layer. Nano-filled resin composite was applied incrementally to build up the tooth in normal anatomy and contour followed by finishing and polishing. The restoration was cemented on the prepared tooth using dual-cure resin cement, high spots were checked and relieved, and the restoration was re-polished intra-orally. Periodic follow up visits up to eight months showed effective clinical performance with patient satisfaction.Conclusion: Indirect Composite Restoration provides luxury of application, manipulation and curing of composite outside the oral cavity. It offers better marginal assessment for the restoration and optimum contouring.